My favorite quote from last night....
"We were all happy with the sort of toned down Angela version of the fabric selections that would be more appropriate for this particular challenge than the full tilt boogie Angela quilted extravaganza of puff"
...heehee....
That's really all I want to write....
but I'll leave you with a question....
(please give a little feedback if you happen to have a tattoo...
OR...know anything about tattoos...)
Can't go into too much detail yet...but...
A 6 inch tattoo is BIG isn't it?
I feel like that's GI-NORMOUS....
My husband has ingrained in my mind that 6 inches is huge...
so maybe it's just me...
I don't know.
(heehee....little joke babe)
Advice?!
I've been holding up a ruler to my leg....and I think I'm fairly certain.....it's a big tattoo.....
but in the world of tattoos...
maybe it's not....
And because far be it for me to have a photo-less post....
I leave you with some shots of my littles in Gabby's wedding....
w/ their flower girl cousins....
How stinking cute were they?
Happy 3rd Anniversary Gab and Mike :)
ok, it was yesterday....
but I sent a card...
ok, it was an e-card...
but it's the thought...
right?
Yeah, and btw... the bride and groom were really cute too. xxe
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
6 inches is big.
big on a leg.
i would go for it on my lower back though.
i have one, not sure exactly how big it is inch wise, but i know it is close.
i love it there cause i can hide it if i have to...and with my job...i have to. :o(
can't wait to hear what you get...
hmmm...
no tats here.
but 6 inches seems ginormous.
hmmmm
I'm curious to hear the concensus. ;)
and your little dudes are/were ADORABLE!
big on the leg... I think that's probably going to be good on the back though.
kiddo is cutedo. (ok that doesn't really work, but my intentions were good)
I agree...
6 inches does seem ginormous for the leg...
but do what seems right for you! :)
I have to get mine soon. It's my 30th bday gift to me...and I'm about to turn 31 in less than 2 months! Gotta get it before then. Yikes! But I've wanted one since I was 23 so it's about time, right?
Can't wait to see yours! Whatcha gonna get?
Oh and your boylies?!
ADORABLE...then AND now! :)
6 inches is large.
and in charge.
love the pics of the boylies.
xo.
6 inches = big.
i have a small little tat. it's maybe 1.5x1.5 and that's big enough for me ;)
Okay.
I have 4 tats....one of which is about...ohhh.....mayb 8 inches big.
But it's on my back.
And I like it there, cause I can cover it if I need to.
If it was on my leg...well...skirts...capris...shorts....I would not necessarily be able to always wear them, depending upon the situation. Ya know??
6 inches isn't that big...
not like HUGE HUGE.
for a tat that is.
hee.
now i'm laughing at myself....
i have short legs, tho. yours are much much longer, i'm sure. therefore. 6 will be fine.
oooof.
so much more to say.
and can't.
eeek!
LOVE YOU.
and your cutie babies too.
xoxox,
g
Sorry, no tats for this girl... too much of a chicken, lol! And look how cute and tiny your boys were... so ADORABLE!!! Happy weekend friend!
I have to be anonymous cuz I have no clue what my password is/was and i'm not signing up again...to much guilt for not posting in ages!
Anywho, the ? at hand...6 inches....of course it's all relative. *snicker giggle* to some it MAY be HUGE..and others it is just right.( no offense Colin) As for your tat...( that's what we are talking about) I think depending on placement it can be a little on the big side my friend, my one and only tat is 1 1/2 inches stem to stearn and on my ankle. Depending on 'who' you get to do it...they can shrink an idea down and still be able to get in the lovely details you are looking for.
Helena and DaGirlz
Don't have any tattoos, but I ALMOST got one on my lower back, the summer after H.S. graduation! It was gonna be across the small of my back w/vines and a heart in the middle w/Scott's name in it! LOL, huh?! Can't wait to see/hear what you get, how fun!!!!!! =)
LOVE the pics of your cuties!!!!
Post a Comment